FTC enforcement of its new blogger guidelines has involved typically high-profile actions against Anne Taylor LOFT (FTC ultimately taking no action) and Reverb Communications (for allegedly deceptive postings of positive reviews on iTunes for games produced by Reverb clients).
While premature to draw any broad conclusions on the enforcement environment for the new rules, a philosophical problem with the FTC’s new blogger framework is its willful ignorance of the advertising underpinnings of traditional media.
So, for example, while established newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Post depend for their credibility on perceived soundness of the journalistic “church-state” divide, readers are almost never proactively alerted to major advertising support from common story subjects in business and politics. Disclosure more typically comes from investment or ownership relationships, in the form of “full disclosure” statements like that from Ezra Klein when reporting about Facebook (“Disclosure: Washington Post Co. Chairman Donald E. Graham is on Facebook’s board, and The Post markets itself on Facebook.”). Not, though, from advertising relationships, even major advertisers.
At least not with newspapers. PBS’ Newshour, NPR and other public news broadcasts commonly disclose underwriting relationships involving story subjects. However, the same cannot be said of commercial television news broadcasts unless they involve investment or ownership relationships.
Since the underwriting structure of public broadcasting is substantively no different than the advertising relationships of newspapers, commercial television and most media websites, editorial disclosure of the financial support – of any kind – of such media outlets seems equally appropriate.
Citizen Media Law Project, in its coverage of Anne Taylor action, notes that the FTC guidelines limit disclosure to cases where the sponsorship relationship is not “reasonably expected by the audience”.
Put in the context of audience reasonable expectation, this seems rather generously written for the benefit of old-line media, which has relied for generations on the presumption of credibility by its readership much more so than disclosure.
Why then, shouldn’t bloggers be afforded the same benefit of the doubt that newspaper publishers have been given for generations? Yes, there will always be egregious cases of paid-for “earned media” such as the Reverb case with iTunes. But it used to be that time and dedicated readership was the ultimate arbiter of media influence.
This all begs the question of why the expectation of the relationship – rather than actual influence – is the measuring stick.
Add Comment